Health
Does Your Dog Deserve Cancer?

Does Your Dog Deserve Cancer?

Your reaction upon reading the title of this article was probably something along the lines of “Of course not!” But did you know that various synthetic dyes have been linked to cancers? And, in Australia, pet food manufacturers are under no obligation to reveal what, exactly, is included under the category colouring.

Food Dyes Linked to Cancer and Other Health Risks

What is well documented are the dangers of certain artificial colours added to both animal and human foods. Red Dye No. 3 has been linked to cancers, Yellow No. 5 to allergic reactions, and Blue Dye No. 1 with neurotoxicity. One wonders why, when there are grave concerns about these dyes, why they are added in the first place as they offer no nutritional benefits whatsoever. While the amounts an average person might consume are considered not to be harmful, consider that a dog or cat fed a commercial kibble will eat the same food day in and day out, potentially for years. That’s a recipe for potential disaster!

Reading Labels in Australia Only Helps So Much

With that in mind, have a look at the labels on the commercial dog foods next time you are at the supermarket. Colouring? Ok. But what type and how much? Who knows? And then ask yourself, does your dog deserve cancer? Or, does your canine companion deserve better? Food dyes are used in commercial dog foods and, sadly, though the price may be tempting, there’s a reason why we use the saying, cheap and nasty.

Our Dogs Depend on Us

Sometimes, we all need to cut corners, but to my way of thinking we shouldn’t make our dogs pay the price. At Rawmate, we can be pretty picky sometimes about who we bring on-board. We are building the future and if you aren't 100% committed to doing the absolute best by your dog, then we wish you luck and urge you to find a solution within your price range (without paint, colouring, meal, by-products, cereals or grains).

Any Colouring in Rawmate Prepared Meals?

Hell no! You might notice the sheer list of ingredients in Rawmate formulations. We operate on the principle of "as little supplementation as possible”. This is one of our guiding mantras. If it takes 25 ingredients to find the right balance naturally, then so be it. You won't find any powders, meal, by-product, grain, cereals, colours or paint in any of our AAFCO Complete and Balanced meal plan solutions. Ever!

Who Knows What’s in that Bowl of Kibble

We've discussed it here before on the Rawmate blog, in Australia we are in a period of non-regulation when it comes to the creation, manufacture and distribution of Pet Foods. A nutritional panel on a bag of "Australian Made Kibble" might say colouring, but what combinations of colours listed in the table below do you think that might include? Who knows?

 

Additive

Function

Natural or Synthetic

Year Banned

Problem

Agene (nitrogen trichloride)

flour bleaching and aging agent

synthetic

1949

Dogs that ate bread made from treated flour suffered epileptic-like fits; the toxic agent was methionine sulfoxime.

Artificial Colorings:

 

 

 

 

Butter yellow

artificial coloring

synthetic

1919

Toxic, later found to cause liver cancer.

Green 1

artificial coloring

synthetic

1965

Liver cancer

Green 2

artificial coloring

synthetic

1965

Insufficient economic importance to be tested

Orange 1

artificial coloring

synthetic

1956

Organ damage

Orange 2

artificial coloring

synthetic

1960

Organ damage

Orange B

artificial coloring

synthetic

1978 (ban never finalized)

Contained low levels of a cancer-causing contaminant. Orange B was used only in sausage casings to color sausages, but is no longer used in the United States.

Red 1

artificial coloring

synthetic

1961

Liver cancer

Red 2

artificial coloring

synthetic

1976

Possible carcinogen

Red 4

artificial coloring

synthetic

1976

High levels damaged adrenal cortex of dog; after 1965 it was used only in maraschino cherries and certain pills; it is still allowed in externally applied drugs and cosmetics.

Red 32

artificial coloring

synthetic

1956

Damages internal organs and may be a weak carcinogen; since 1956 it continues to be used under the name Citrus Red 2 only to color oranges (2 ppm).

Sudan 1

artificial coloring

synthetic

1919

Toxic, later found to be carcinogenic.

Violet 1

artificial coloring

synthetic

1973

Cancer (it had been used to stamp the Department of Agriculture’s inspection mark on beef carcasses).

Yellow 1 & 2

artificial coloring

synthetic

1959

Intestinal lesions at high dosages.

Yellow 3

artificial coloring

synthetic

1959

Heart damage at high dosages.

Yellow 4

artificial coloring

synthetic

1959

Heart damage at high dosages.

Other Additives:

 

 

 

 

cinnamyl anthranilate

artificial flavoring

synthetic

1982

Liver cancer

cobalt salts

stabilize beer foam

synthetic

1966

Toxic effects on heart

coumarin

flavoring

tonka bean

1970

Liver poison

cyclamate

artificial sweetener

synthetic

1969

Bladder cancer, damage to testes; now not thought to cause cancer directly, but to increase the potency of other carcinogens.

diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)

preservative (beverages)

synthetic

1972

Combines with ammonia to form urethane, a carcinogen

dulcin (p-ethoxy-phenylurea)

artificial sweetener

synthetic

1950

Liver cancer

ethylene glycol

solvent

synthetic

1998

Kidney damage

monochloroacetic acid

preservative

synthetic

1941

Highly toxic

nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA)

antioxidant

desert plant

1968 (FDA), 1971 (USDA)

Kidney damage

oil of calamus

flavoring

root of calamus

1968

Intestinal cancer

polyoxyethylene-8-stearate (Myrj 45)

emulsifier

synthetic

1952

High levels caused bladder stones and tumors

safrole

flavoring (root beer)

sassafras

1960

Liver cancer

thiourea

preservative

synthetic

c. 1950

Liver cancer

 

Compare our wild west attitude of pet food production to what you see in the United States, where relations require manufacturers to clearly state exactly what colouring means, and you can see we have a problem. I won’t rant about this again here, but seriously, why do regulators here not think our animal companions are worth protecting?

Welcome, and Thank You!

I did want to give all of you readers a shout out. I know that you are here and reading this blog because you DO care about your dogs and for that I am deeply grateful. It can feel a bit lonely standing up here on my soapbox sometimes!

 

If you’ve just stumbled on this blog, then welcome. Maybe you found your way here because you are looking for real, whole, healthy food for your dog. Well, you’ve found it! Healthier Dog Food Delivered! That's us.

 

As for that informative table above, it’s from the Centre for Science in the Public Interest. The website has lots of great information if you are looking for science-backed research about healthy foods. Yes, it’s wonderful that you are feeding your dogs well, that’s as it should be, but there’s lots to be learned about the toxins, additives, and failings of the human food supply as well.

 

 

Matt Joseph

Staff writer

There are 0 Comments

Leave a comment

Name .
.
Message .

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published